4 Blonder Boulevard • Ledyard, Connecticut 06339 • (860) 464-9255 • Fax: (860) 464-8589
72-00

Strategic School Profile 2006 - 2007

Ledyard School District
MICHAEL H. GRANER, Superintendent

Telephone: 860-464-9255


This profile was produced by the CT State Department of Education in accordance with CT General Statutes 10-220(c).

COMMUNITY DATA

County: New London Public School Enrollment as % of Town Population: 19.6%
2000 Population: 14,687 Public School Enrollment as % of Total Student Pop: 94.5%
1990-2000 Pop. Growth: -1.5% Percent of Adults w/o a High School Diploma in 2000: 8.5%
2000 Per Capita Income: $24,953 Adult Education Enrollment in 05-06 School Year: 58
Number of Public Schools: 6 Number of Adults Receiving Diplomas in 05-06 School Yr.: 23
Number of Nonpublic Schools: 0  

Education Reference Group (ERG): D   ERG is a classification of districts whose students' families are similar in education, income, occupation, and need, and that have roughly similar enrollment.

DISTRICT NEED

Current and Past District Need Year District ERG State
% of Students Eligible for Free/Reduced-Price Meals 2006-07
2002-03
6.5
3.5
10.0
N/A
27.3
25.4
% of K-12 Students with Non-English Home Language 2006-07
2001-02
2.0
1.3
6.1
N/A
12.8
12.8
% of Elementary and Middle School Students above Entry
Grade who Attended this School the Previous Year
2006-07
2001-02
88.9
86.7
92.7
N/A
88.6
86.9
% of Kindergarten Students who Attended Preschool,
Nursery School, or Headstart
2006-07
2001-02
78.5
87.0
83.9
N/A
79.3
75.1
% of Juniors and Seniors Working More Than 16 Hours
Per Week
2006-07
2001-02
25.1
22.4
23.0
N/A
20.2
29.1

STUDENT ENROLLMENT AND RACE/ETHNICITY

Enrollment
Grade RangePK-12
Total January Enrollment 2916
5-Year Oct. Enrollment Change -7.0%
Projected Oct. 2011 Enrollment
  Elementary 1,647
  Middle School 417
  High School 1004
  Pre-Kindergarten, Other 23
Race/Ethnicity (January)NumberPercent
American Indian 122 4.2
Asian American 149 5.1
Black 150 5.1
Hispanic 148 5.1
White 2,347 80.5
Other270.9
Total Minority 2006-07 569 19.5
Total Minority 2001-02 499 15.9

EFFORTS TO REDUCE RACIAL, ETHNIC, AND ECONOMIC ISOLATION

Connecticut law requires that school districts provide educational opportunities for its students to interact with students and teachers from diverse racial, ethnic, and economic backgrounds.

The Ledyard school district continues to be dedicated and diligent in its efforts to reduce racial, ethnic, and economic isolation. As seen in the individual School Profiles, Ledyard Public Schools provided over 20 opportunities to reduce racial, ethnic and economic isolation. Many more opportunities are subtle as they are imbedded into the curriculum through district-wide revision, but these changes will make a great difference. For instance, during the 06-07 academic year, the district's Instructional Council asked school department chairs and leaders to revisit the choice literature to meet the needs of our diverse student body. This will be an ongoing curriculum conversation in the next several years. District teachers routinely offer and make improvements to instructional lessons that broaden the cultural horizons of our students. Our award-winning music program is yet another example of a program that routinely celebrates diversity through multicultural music expression. Concerts continue to include work that celebrates diversity in an effort to teach our student body and bring together our community.

During the 2006-07 academic year, Ledyard High School, the Mashantucket Tribal Nation, and New London High School formed a Youth Leadership Coalition. Students are being trained as youth leaders to work with their peers to better understand diversity and to provide positive communication strategies for students. Participation is supported by the Mayor, the Superintendents of Schools in New London and Ledyard, and the Mashantucket tribal leadership. In the last few years, district and building administrators have worked closely with Mashantucket Pequot Tribal leaders to improve the student achievement of all students.

Ledyard Public Schools, through its Agri-Science program, provides a quality education to 230 students who come to our high school from neighboring urban, suburban, and rural towns, and this integration provides a more diverse student community that benefits the entire town. This program continues to make improvements to draw students from our neighboring towns, and this year it will focus on curriculum revision.

 


DISTRICT RESOURCES

Staff Count (Full-Time Equivalent)
# of Certified Staff 
  Teachers 207.7
  Administrators 14.2
  Department Chairs 1.6
  Library/Media Staff4.0
  Other Professionals 23.6
  % Minority 2006-07 2.0
  % Minority 2001-02 2.3
# Non-Certified Instructional 65.9
Average Class SizeDistrictERGState
Grade K 2006-07
2001-02
17.3
16.0
17.6
N/A
18.2
18.3
Grade 2 2006-07
1998-99
19.8
22.0
19.2
N/A
19.5
19.6
Grade 5 2006-07
1998-99
20.6
23.2
21.1
N/A
21.2
21.5
Grade 7 2006-07
2001-02
18.0
24.8
21.1
N/A
20.8
21.9
High School 2006-07
2001-02
23.5
19.3
20.3
N/A
20.0
19.9

Professional Staff Experience and Training District DRG State
Average Years of Experience in Connecticut and Other Locations
16.0
14.9
14.4
% with Master's Degree or Above
83.6
78.1
78.9

Total Hours of
Instruction Per Yr.*
Dist ERG State
Elementary
Middle School
High School
972
1,023
981
984
1,021
997
987
1,016
1,002
*State law requires at least 900 hours for grade 1-12 and full-day kindergarten, and 450 hours for half-day kindergarten.
Resource Ratios District ERG State
Students Per Academic Computer 3.2 3.6 3.2
Students Per Teacher 14.0 13.8 13.5
Teachers Per Administrator 13.5 15.3 13.9

STUDENT PERFORMANCE

Physical Fitness

District

State

Of All Districts in State
Lowest %
Highest %

% Passing All 4 Tests

39.8

34.6

0.0
85.0

 

Connecticut Mastery Test, Fourth Generation, % Meeting State Goal: The Goal level is more demanding than the state Proficient level, but not as high as the Advanced level, reported in the No Child Left Behind Report Cards.

Grade and CMT Subject Area

District

State

Of All Districts in State

Lowest %
Highest %

Grade 3 Reading

58.1

52.3

13.1

86.4

Grade 3 Writing

66.8

60.8

20.0

88.9

Grade 3 Mathematics

59.6

59.4

15.0

91.3

Grade 4 Reading

58.8

57.0

14.1

91.3

Grade 4 Writing

61.3

65.1

20.0

90.2

Grade 4 Mathematics

69.4

62.3

17.9

100.0

Grade 5 Reading

64.5

61.4

19.5

92.3

Grade 5 Writing

61.6

64.6

25.0

95.5

Grade 5 Mathematics

70.5

66.0

23.5

93.3

Grade 6 Reading

74.7

64.3

16.7

96.3

Grade 6 Writing

63.3

63.0

20.8

93.6

Grade 6 Mathematics

75.6

63.9

10.2

92.8

Grade 7 Reading
72.8
65.9
3.8
96.8
Grade 7 Writing
60.2
60.4
0.0
95.0
Grade 7 Mathematics
74.3
60.3
7.7
92.0
Grade 8 Reading
78.8
66.6
4.8
94.0
Grade 8 Writing
79.7
64.0
0.0
94.6

Grade 8 Mathematics

71.2

60.8

4.5

95.7

These results reflect the performance of students with scoreable tests who were enrolled in the district at the time of testing, regardless of the length of time they were enrolled in the district. Results for fewer than 20 students are not presented.

For more detailed CMT results, go to www.ctreports.com.
To see the NCLB Report Card for this district, go to www.sde.ct.gov and click on "No Child Left Behind".

 

Connecticut Academic Performance Test, Third Generation, % Meeting State Goal: The CAPT test is administered to Grade 10 students. The Goal level is more demanding than the state Proficient level, but not as high as the Advanced level, reported in the No Child Left Behind Report Cards.

CAPT Subject Area
District
State
Of All Districts in State
Lowest %
Highest %
Reading Across the Disciplines
36.0
45.6
2.8
87.2
Writing Across the Disciplines
49.5
52.9
0.0
87.4
Mathematics
49.7
45.2
0.0
86.3
Science
55.9
44.4
0.0
84.5

These results reflect the performance of students with scoreable tests who were enrolled in the district at the time of testing, regardless of the length of time they were enrolled in the district.

For more detailed CMT results, go to www.ctreports.com.
To see the NCLB Report Card for this district, go to www.sde.ct.gov and click on "No Child Left Behind".

SAT© I: Reasoning Test

Class of 2001

Class of 2006

District

District

State
Of All Districts in State
Lowest %
Highest %

% of Graduates Tested

80.9

73.3

74.7

23.8
100.0

Mathematics: Average Score

514

490

510

284
604

Mathematics: % Scoring 600 or More

27.5

13.8

23.9

0.0
55.6

Critical Reading: Average Score

528

517

505

346
595

Critical Reading: % Scoring 600 or More

24.2

24.3

21.3

0.0
48.5
Writing: Average Score
N/A
504
504
337
595
Writing: % Scoring 600 or more
N/A
17.7
20.3
0.0
48.8

 

Graduation and Dropout Rates

District

State

Of All Districts in State

Lowest %
Highest %
Graduation Rate for Class of 2006
95.0
92.2
66.7
100.0

Cumulative Four-Year Dropout Rate for Class of 2006

4.4

6.6

0.0

72.5

2005-06 Annual Rate for Grades 9 through 12

1.3

1.8

0.0

19.2

2000-01 Annual Rate for Grades 9 through 12

3.1

3.0

N/A

N/A

 

Activities of Graduates
Class of
# in District
District %
State %
Pursuing Higher Education
2006
2001
218
170
88.3
75.6
82.7
79.1
Employed or in Military
2006
2001
28
39
11.3
17.3
12.9
17.1
Unemployed
2006
2001
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.8
0.7

SPECIAL EDUCATION

DISTRICT OVERVIEW

Number of K-12 Students with Disabilities for Whom the District is Financially Responsible 305
Of All K-12 Students for Whom the District is Financially Responsible, the Percent of Students with Disabilities 10.9%
Total PK-12 Special Education Expenditures, 2005-06 $6,940,372
Enrollment in District PK-12 Special Education Programs 329
Full-Time Equivalent Count of District PK-12 Special Education Instructional Staff
    Teachers and Instructors 25.4
    Paraprofessional Instructional Assistants 40.0

 

Of All K-12 Students for Whom District is Financially Responsible, Number and Percentage with Disabilities
Disability
Count
District Percent
DRG Percent
State Percent
Autism
31
1.1
0.7
0.6
Learning Disability
80
2.9
3.3
4.0
Intellectual Disability
6
0.2
0.4
0.5
Emotional Disturbance
26
0.9
0.9
1.0
Speech Impairment
42
1.5
2.4
2.3
Other Health Impairment*
89
3.2
2.1
1.9
Other Disabilities**
31
1.1
1.0
0.9
Total
305
10.9
10.7
11.2

* Includes chronic health problems such as attention deficit disorders and epilepsy.
** Includes hearing, visual, and orthopedic impairments, deaf-blindness, multple disabilities, traumatic brain injury, and developmental delay.

Connecticut Mastery Test, Fourth Generation, Percentage of Students with Disabilities Meeting State Goal. The following results include students attending district schools who participated in the standard assessment with or without accommodations for their disabilities.

Grade and CMT Subject Area

Students With Disabilities

All Students

District
State
District
State

Grade 3 Reading

N/A

N/A

58.1

52.3

Grade 3 Writing

N/A

N/A

66.8

60.8

Grade 3 Mathematics

N/A

N/A

59.6

59.4

Grade 4 Reading

24.0

16.5

58.8

57.0

Grade 4 Writing

21.7

21.2

61.3

65.1

Grade 4 Mathematics

44

25.7

69.4

62.3

Grade 5 Reading

30.4

19.5

64.5

61.4

Grade 5 Writing

13.0

20.7

61.6

64.6

Grade 5 Mathematics

8.7

24.6

70.5

66.0

Grade 6 Reading

30.4

20.1

74.7

64.3

Grade 6 Writing

17.4

18.6

63.3

63.0

Grade 6 Mathematics

26.1

20.8

75.6

63.9

Grade 7 Reading
33.3
21.4
72.8
65.9
Grade 7 Writing
26.1
16.3
60.2
60.4
Grade 7 Mathematics
45.8
18.1
74.3
60.3
Grade 8 Reading
N/A
N/A
78.8
66.6
Grade 8 Writing
N/A
N/A
79.7
64.0

Grade 8 Mathematics

N/A

N/A

71.2

60.8

For more detailed CMT results, go to www.ctreports.com. Results for fewer than 20 students are not presented.

Connecticut Academic Performance Test, Third Generation, Percentage of Students with Disabilities Meeting State Goal: The CAPT test is administered to Grade 10 students. The following results include students attending district schools who participated in the standard assessment with or without accommodations for their disabilities.

CAPT Subject Area
Students with Disabilities
All Students
District
State
District
State
Reading Across the Disciplines
2.7
11.3
36.0
45.6
Writing Across the Disciplines
22.2
12.7
49.5
52.9
Mathematics
20.5
12.8
49.7
45.2
Science
27.0
14.7
55.9
44.4

For more detailed CMT results, go to www.ctreports.com. Results for fewer than 20 students are not presented.

Accommodations for a student's disability may be made to allow him or her to participate in testing. Students whose disabilities prevent them from taing the test even with accommodations are assessed by means of a list of skills aligned to the same content and grade level standardsas the CMT and CAPT.

Participation in State Assessments of Students with
Disabilities Attending District Schools
CMT % Without Accommodations
19.2
  % With Accommodations
80.8
CAPT % Without Accommodations
15.4
  % With Accommodations
84.6
% Assessed Using Skills Checklist
11.5

 

Graduation and Dropout Rates of Students with Disabilities for Whom District is Financially Responsible
District
State
% Who Graduated in 2005-06 with a Standard Diploma
93.5
73.5
2005-06 Annual Dropout Rate for Students Aged 14 to 21
1.7
3.8

DISTRICT REVENUES/EXPENDITURES 2005-06

Expenditures may be supported by local tax revenues, state grants, federal grants, municipal in-kind services, tuition and other sources. DRG and state figures will not be comparable to the district if the school district does not teach both elementary and secondary students.

Expenditures
All figures are unaudited.
Total
(in 1000s)
Expenditures Per Pupil
District
PK-12
Districts
DRG
State
Instructional Staff and Services
$18,910
$6,460
$6,882
$6,375
$6,888
Instructional Supplies and Equipment
$715
$244
$247
$234
$249
Improvement of Instruction and Educational Media Services
$548
$187
$415
$344
$402
Student Support Services
$1,898
$649
$720
$675
$719
Administration and Support Services
$3,862
$1,320
$1,186
$1,138
$1,197
Plant Operation and Maintenance
$2,661
$909
$1,206
$1,099
$1,199
Transportation
$1,828
$635
$560
$517
$558
Costs for Students Tuitioned Out
$1,113
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Other
$417
$143
$135
$131
$132
Total
$31,953
$10,758
$11,595
$10,752
$11,558
Additional Expenditures
Land, Buildings, and Debt Service
$749
$256
$1,866
$1,152
$1,834
Adult Education
$41
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

 

Revenue Sources, % from Source. Revenue sources do not include state funded Teachers' Retirement Board contributions, vocational-technical school operations, SDE budgeted costs for salaries and leadership activities and other state-funded school districts (e.g., Dept. of Children and Families and Dept. of Corrections).

District Expenditures
Local Revenue
State Revenue
Federal Revenue
Tuition & Other
With School Construction
57.0
36.2
2.4
4.4
Without School Construction
56.5
36.5
2.5
4.5

 

Selected Regular Education Expenditures, Amount Per Pupil and Percent Change from Prior Year. Selected regular education expenditures exclude costs of special education and land, building, and debt service.

Expenditures by Grade Level
District
DRG
State
Per Pupil
% Change
Per Pupil
% Change
Per Pupil
% Change
Elementary and Middle
  Total
$8,329
13.3
$8,685
4.7
$9,520
5.1
  Salaries and Benefits
$6,984
11.1
$7,212
4.8
$7,850
5.3
  Supplies
$548
26.9
$453
-1.3
$547
6.6
  Equipment
$102
251.7
$121
-7.6
$124
-6.8
High School
  Total
$9,209
5.8
$9,536
2.6
$10,074
4.5
  Salaries and Benefits
$7,823
5.3
$7,777
3.2
$8,120
4.7
  Supplies
$520
14.0
$532
-1.3
$625
6.8
  Equipment
$118
122.6
$127
-26.6
$150
-1.3

EQUITABLE ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES AMONG DISTRICT SCHOOLS
Below is the description submitted by this district of how it allocates resources to insure equity and address needs.

It is the policy of Ledyard Public Schools that each school receives comparable resources within the district's financial limitations and needs. Each year, principals and central office administrators meet to review budgetary needs at each building and district-wide. Building administrators and central office administrators work together to develop a budget reflective of each school's needs. Issues such as enrollment, curriculum initiatives, including the purchasing of materials and textbooks and student/teacher ratio, drive budgetary decisions.

During the budget process, which begins in October, principals meet with their staff to determine needs. Those needs are brought to the central office where they are reviewed, prioritized, and brought before the Board of Education Finance Committee. The Board of Education and the Superintendent hold several public forums allowing public input from the community and the parents. The forums ensure that the public understands the needs of the school district and ensure an equitable distribution of resources. As a result of the budget review process in spring 2007, per pupil expenditures at each school were reviewed and adjusted to ensure equitable allocation of resources.

 


SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLANS AND ACTIVITIES
The following narrative was submitted by this district.

The Ledyard school district is committed to continuous improvement in all areas of student achievement. Many students who participate in our music, art, and sports programs and who worked on literary publications continue to win state and national recognition and awards. Additionally, students in our math and science programs are consistently recognized.

During the 06-07 year there was a concentrated effort to improve achievement through the use of School Improvement Plans that are aligned to District and Board of Education Plans. The district worked to improve achievement through the use of K-12 common formative assessments, and this will be a focus again this year. The standards-based IEP and the formative assessment data have provided a concrete way to measure the progress and make program adjustments for all of our students. CRISS training (Creating Independence through Student-Owned Strategies) continues to be mandated for all core grades 4-12 educators to provide differentiated instruction for all of our students. K-6 teachers and building administrators routinely look at student work to make programmatic adjustments. The district and building administrators continue to work toward inclusive classroom environments that promote the achievement of all students. Additionally, the district provided a focus on administrative coaching through classroom walk-throughs and follow-up conversations regarding written curriculum, taught curriculum, and effective pedagogy.

Ledyard provides an extended-day kindergarten intervention program for the students who are most at-risk. This program has been recognized by the Connecticut Reading Association and has been very successful in bringing students to district benchmarks.

K-6 teachers and administrators provide frequent and specific information to parents regarding formative assessments and their child's progress toward those benchmarks. Parent communication will continue to be both a Board of Education and district focus in the next year.

Connecticut Mastery Test scores continue to reflect an upward trend in all academic areas as students progress from grade 3 through grade 8. Reading and Reading Across Content Areas will be a focus for the next academic year at the elementary, middle and high school levels.

 

To view Strategic School Profiles on the internet, go to www.sde.ct.gov and click on Connectcut Education Data and Research. Additional education data are also available at this site. For the school district website, see www.ledyard.net