A Message from the Assistant Superintendent of Schools
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) School Report: 2006-07 School Year ![]()
Ledyard School District
The No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 requires a statewide school accountability system. As part of this system, school districts receiving federal dollars based on the percentage of district students in poverty (referred to as Title I funds) must prepare and disseminate annual accountability reports which in Connecticut, present the performance of students in mathematics and reading on the Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) and the Connecticut Academic Performance Test (CAPT), as well as information about the qualifications of teachers based on the federal definition of "highly qualified" teachers.
Adequate Yearly Progress
The state is required to determine annually if every district is making adequate yearly progress (AYP) toward reaching the goal, by 2014, of having 100 percent of its student population scoring at or above tin Proficient level in mathematics and reading on the CMT and CAPT. For a district to have made AYP, the following criteria must have been met by all students in the district and be each subgroup (major racial and ethnic groups, students in poverty, students with disabilities and English language learners): (1) 95 percent participation on both the mathematics and reading CMT and CAPT; (2) achievement of the AYP target percentage at or above Proficient in mathematics and reading on the CMT and CAPT; and (3) achievement of the AYP target for an additional academic indicator, 70 percent at or above Basic on the writing subtest of the CMT or improvement from the previous year. If a school does not make AYP for two consecutive years, it will be identified as "in need of improvement." More information about AYP can be found on Page 2 of this report.
Adequate Yearly Progress Status for Ledyard School District = Achieved
Subject |
Grade 3 |
Grade 4 |
Grade 5 |
Grade 6 |
Grade 7 |
Grade 8 |
||||||
2005-06 |
2006-07 |
2005-06 |
2006-07 |
2005-05 |
2006-07 |
2005-06 |
2006-07 |
2005-06 |
2006-07 |
2005-06 |
2006-07 |
|
Mathematics |
82 |
80 |
87 |
86 |
84 |
86 |
90 |
90 |
88 |
89 |
89 |
92 |
Reading |
68 |
76 |
75 |
74 |
77 |
76 |
84 |
86 |
84 |
78 |
85 |
85 |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Status Data for the 2006-07 School Year
Based on 2007 Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) results and the 2007 Connecticut Academic Performance Test (CAPT)
The tables below show this district's performance on the AYP indicators. A district fails AYP if there is a "No" under the AYP Target Met column for BOTH the CMT and me CAPT. Only students who were enrolled in this district for the full academic year were included in these calculations.
Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) Results (Grades 3 through 8)
Subgroup |
Participation Rate (95 % participation needed) |
% At or Above Proficient |
|||||||||||
Mathematics |
Reading |
AYP |
Mathematics (74 % proficient needed) |
Reading (68 % proficient needed) |
|||||||||
Current |
2 Year Avg. |
3 Year Avg. |
Current |
2 Year Avg. |
3 Year Avg. |
AYP Calculation |
AYP Target Met? |
AYP Calculation |
AYP Target Met? |
||||
Whole District |
99:8 |
99.9 |
99.9 |
99.8 |
99.4 |
99.6 |
Yes |
89.6 |
Yes |
81.2 |
Yes |
||
American Indian |
100 |
98.5 |
97.7 |
100 |
97 |
98 |
Yes |
69.8 |
No |
53.6 |
No |
||
Asian American |
98.7 |
99.4 |
99.6 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
Yes |
100 |
Yes |
94 |
Yes |
||
Black |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
Yes |
86.8 |
Yes |
82.9 |
Yes |
||
Hispanic |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
Yes |
86.4 |
Yes |
80.5 |
Yes |
||
White |
99.8 |
99.9 |
99.9 |
99.7 |
99.8 |
99.9 |
Yes |
92.5 |
Yes |
84.5 |
Yes |
||
Students with Disabilities |
99.3 |
99.2 |
98.8 |
100 |
98.5 |
99 |
Yes |
57.2 |
No |
42.5 |
No |
||
English Language Learners |
Fewer than 40 students in this subgroup |
Fewer than 40 students in this subgroup |
Fewer than 40 students in this subgroup |
||||||||||
Economically Disadvantaged |
100 |
99.5 |
99.7 |
100 |
98.5 |
99 |
Yes |
86.4 |
Yes |
76.6 |
Yes |
||
Additional Academic Indicator: Writing |
AYP Target Met? Yes |
||||||||||||
Connecticut Academic Performance Test (CAPT) Results (Grade 10)
Subgroup |
Participation Rate (95 % participation needed) |
% At or Above Proficient |
|||||||||||
Mathematics |
Reading |
AYP |
Mathematics (69 % proficient needed) |
Reading (72 % proficient needed) |
|||||||||
Current |
2 Year Avg. |
3 Year Avg. |
Current |
2 Year Avg. |
3 Year Avg. |
AYP Calculation |
AYP Target Met? |
AYP Calculation |
AYP Target Met? |
||||
Whole District |
97.6 |
98.8 |
98.2 |
97 |
98 |
98.3 |
Yes |
90.4 |
Yes |
96.8 |
Yes |
||
American Indian |
Fewer than 40 students in this subgroup |
Fewer than 40 students in this subgroup |
Fewer than 40 students in this subgroup |
||||||||||
Asian American |
Fewer than 40 students in this subgroup |
Fewer than 40 students in this subgroup |
Fewer than 40 students in this subgroup |
||||||||||
Black |
Fewer than 40 students in this subgroup |
Fewer than 40 students in this subgroup |
Fewer than 40 students in this subgroup |
||||||||||
Hispanic |
Fewer than 40 students in this subgroup |
Fewer than 40 students in this subgroup |
Fewer than 40 students in this subgroup |
||||||||||
White |
98.4 |
99.2 |
98.5 |
98.4 |
98.7 |
98.8 |
Yes |
93.8 |
Yes |
99.1 |
Yes |
||
Students with Disabilities |
Fewer than 40 students in this subgroup |
Fewer than 40 students in this subgroup |
Fewer than 40 students in this subgroup |
||||||||||
English Language Learners |
Fewer than 40 students in this subgroup |
Fewer than 40 students in this subgroup |
Fewer than 40 students in this subgroup |
||||||||||
Economically Disadvantaged |
Fewer than 40 students in this subgroup |
Fewer than 40 students in this subgroup |
Fewer than 40 students in this subgroup |
||||||||||
Additional Academic Indicator: Graduation Rate |
AYP Target Met? Yes |
||||||||||||
2007 Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) Achievement Data
Ledyard School District
NCLB requires assessment data to be reported by different achievement levels. The table below shows the percentage of students scoring at or above the Basic, Proficient, and Advanced levels on the spring 2007 CMT. The numbers on this page were calculated only for groups of 20 or more. The percentage at or above Proficient will not be the same number as on the previous page. The number on the previous page is based on a federally approved AYP calculation used to analyze the adequate yearly progress of districts. In addition, it includes only those students who were in the district for a full academic year; the number on this page includes all students, regardless of their length of time in the district.
|
Math |
Reading |
Writing |
||||||||||
Total # Students |
# Students |
% Students |
% of Students Scoring At or Above |
Total # Students |
# Students |
% Students |
% of Students Scoring At or Above |
% of Students Scoring At or Above Basic |
|||||
Basic |
Proficient |
Advanced |
Basic |
Proficient |
Advanced |
||||||||
Whole District |
1295 |
1292 |
100 |
92 |
87 |
29 |
1295 |
1292 |
100 |
85 |
78 |
22 |
92 |
Subgroup Achievement |
|||||||||||||
American Indian |
59 |
59 |
100 |
68 |
54 |
7 |
59 |
59 |
100 |
56 |
39 |
<5% |
68 |
Asian American |
77 |
76 |
99 |
96 |
94 |
36 |
77 |
77 |
100 |
88 |
83 |
19 |
92 |
Black |
70 |
70 |
100 |
87 |
73 |
21 |
70 |
70 |
100 |
79 |
67 |
14 |
93 |
Hispanic |
61 |
61 |
100 |
84 |
74 |
11 |
61 |
61 |
100 |
74 |
66 |
16 |
87 |
White |
1028 |
1026 |
100 |
94 |
90 |
31 |
1028 |
1025 |
100 |
88 |
81 |
24 |
93 |
Students with Disabilities |
149 |
148 |
99 |
58 |
46 |
7 |
149 |
149 |
100 |
42 |
33 |
<5% |
54 |
English Language Learners |
14 |
14 |
Fewer than 20 students in this subgroup |
14 |
14 |
Fewer than 20 students in this subgroup |
|||||||
Economically Disadvantaged |
65 |
65 |
100 |
83 |
72 |
18 |
65 |
65 |
100 |
71 |
62 |
11 |
78 |
Male |
659 |
657 |
100 |
90 |
85 |
30 |
659 |
656 |
100 |
82 |
73 |
20 |
91 |
Female |
636 |
635 |
100 |
94 |
88 |
28 |
636 |
636 |
100 |
89 |
83 |
23 |
92 |
State Achievement |
259681 |
258542 |
100 |
92 |
82 |
27 |
259683 |
258351 |
100 |
83 |
74 |
19 |
92 |
2007 Connecticut Academic Performance Test (CAPT) Achievement Data
Ledyard School District
NCLB requires assessment data to be reported by different achievement levels. The table below shows the percentage of students scoring at or above the Basic, Proficient, and Advanced levels on the spring 2007 CAPT. The numbers on this page were calculated only for groups of 20 or more. The percentage at. or above Proficient will not be the same number as on the previous page. The number on the previous page is based on a federally approved AYP calculation used to analyze the adequate yearly progress of districts. In addition, it includes only those students who were in the district for a full academic year; the number on this page includes all students, regardless of their length of time in the district.
|
Math |
Reading |
Graduation Rate |
||||||||||
Total # Students |
# Students |
% Students |
% of Students Scoring At or Above |
Total # Students |
# Students |
% Students |
% of Students Scoring At or Above |
||||||
Basic |
Proficient |
Advanced |
Basic |
Proficient |
Advanced |
||||||||
Whole District |
296 |
289 |
98 |
91 |
82 |
19 |
296 |
287 |
97 |
93 |
81 |
15 |
95 |
Subgroup Achievement |
|||||||||||||
American Indian |
9 |
7 |
Fewer than 20 students in this subgroup |
9 |
7 |
Fewer than 20 students in this subgroup |
Graduation rate |
||||||
Asian American |
16 |
16 |
Fewer than 20 students in this subgroup |
16 |
16 |
Fewer than 20 students in this subgroup |
|||||||
Black |
16 |
15 |
Fewer than 20 students in this subgroup |
16 |
14 |
Fewer than 20 students in this subgroup |
|||||||
Hispanic |
12 |
12 |
Fewer than 20 students in this subgroup |
12 |
11 |
Fewer than 20 students in this subgroup |
|||||||
White |
243 |
239 |
98 |
93 |
86 |
21 |
243 |
239 |
98 |
95 |
85 |
16 |
|
Students with Disabilities |
39 |
39 |
100 |
62 |
38 |
7 |
39 |
37 |
95 |
76 |
55 |
<5% |
|
English Language Learners |
3 |
3 |
Fewer than 20 students in this subgroup |
3 |
3 |
Fewer than 20 students in this subgroup |
|||||||
Economically Disadvantaged |
29 |
29 |
100 |
83 |
62 |
<5% |
29 |
27 |
93 |
83 |
69 |
<5% |
|
Male |
132 |
129 |
98 |
93 |
84 |
21 |
132 |
127 |
96 |
94 |
78 |
10 |
|
Female |
164 |
160 |
98 |
93 |
83 |
18 |
164 |
160 |
98 |
97 |
89 |
19 |
|
State Achievement |
44259 |
43201 |
98 |
89 |
80 |
20 |
44256 |
43311 |
98 |
92 |
90 |
20 |
91 |
Qualifications of Teachers Teaching in the Core Academic Areas
Ledyard School District
Table 1. General District Information
These data are provided to describe your district because the NCLB law requires that poor or minority students are not taught by inexperienced, unqualified, or out-of-field teachers at a higher rate than other students. |
|
District Percent Poverty: |
6.5 |
District Percent Minority: |
19.5 |
Percent of Teachers 2 or less years of experience: |
8.8 |
Table 2. General Teacher and Class Information
These data are your highly qualified and not highly qualified teacher FTEs as well as the number of classes taught by highly qualified and not highly qualified teachers. |
|
Total Teacher FTE: |
176.34 |
Highly Qualified Teacher FTE: |
176.34 |
Not Highly Qualified FTE: |
0 |
Total Number of Classes: |
612 |
Number of Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers: |
612 |
Number of Classes Taught by Not Highly Qualified Teachers: |
0 |
Table 3. District Classes Taught by Highly and Not Highly Qualified Teachers
| Percent of Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers | Percent of Classes Taught by Not Highly Qualified Teachers |
||
2005-06 |
2006-07 |
2005-06 |
2006-07 |
99.0 |
100.0 |
1.0 |
0.0 |
|
|||
Table 4. Connecticut Classes Taught by Highly and Not Highly Qualified Teachers
|
Percent of Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers |
Percent of Classes Taught by Not Highly Qualified Teachers |
||
2005-06 |
2006-07 |
2005-06 |
2006-07 |
|
State Overall |
96.8 |
98.0 |
3.2 |
2.0 |
State High Poverty Schools |
93.4 |
95.9 |
6.6 |
4.1 |
State Low Poverty Schools |
98.1 |
98.9 |
1.9 |
1.1 |
State High Minority Schools |
93.1 |
95.8 |
6.9 |
4.2 |
State Low Minority Schools |
97.9 |
98.6 |
2.1 |
1.4 |
* NCLB requires this information for schools in the state, not districts, therefore only data for schools in Connecticut are provided. |
||||