Reading Writing |
Score Point 6 |
Score Point 5 |
Score Point 4 |
Score Point 3 |
Score Point 2 |
Score Point 1 |
| 1.1 |
Demonstrates an awareness of audience and purpose |
Keen awareness of audience is shown |
Awareness of audience is evident |
Some awareness of audience is shown, but persuasiveness may be lacking |
Some awareness of audience may be shown |
Little awareness of audience is shown |
No awareness of audience is shown |
| 1.2 |
Establishes a thesis; takes a position |
Takes a clear, thoughtful, and persuasive position |
Takes a clear and persuasive position |
Takes and develops a position |
Takes a position, but the position is not developed |
Does not take a clear position to address the problem |
Does not take a position to address the problem |
| 1.3 |
Supports ideas with evidence, textual or experimental |
Position is richly supported with information from all source materials, as applicable |
Position is well-supported, using information from all of the source materials, as applicable |
Response contains adequate support but does not use information from each of the source materials, as applicable |
The response contains limited support and does not use information from each source, as applicable |
The response contains only superficial support and/or lacks evidence from supporting materials, as applicable |
The support is based on emotion, is inaccurate, is irrelevant, or shows serious misunderstanding |
| 1.4 |
Demonstrates comprehension of text or issue |
Demonstrates understanding as evidenced by a perceptive, richly supported interpretation |
Demonstrates a basic understanding of information; provides a thoughtful, well-supported interpretation |
Demonstrates a basic understanding of information; provides a plausible interpretation |
Demonstrates some understanding of information |
Demonstrates a literal or superficial understanding |
Demonstrates serious misunderstanding |
| 1.5 |
Demonstrates ability to reflect, revise, reshape, and/or deepen understanding |
Demonstrates exceptional ability to reflect, revise, reshape, and/or deepen initial understanding |
Demonstrates acceptable ability to reflect, revise, reshape, and/or deepen initial understanding |
Demonstrates moderate ability to reflect, revise, reshape, and/or deepen initial understanding |
Demonstrates limited ability to reflect, revise, reshape, and/or deepen initial understanding |
Demonstrates little ability to reflect, revise, reshape, and/or deepen initial understanding |
Demonstrates no ability to reflect, revise, reshape, and/or deepen initial understanding |
| 1.6 |
Makes connections to the text |
Demonstrates perceptive associations or connections and supports with examples |
Demonstrates associations or connections and generally supports these connections |
Demonstrates an association or connection which is not supported with examples |
Demonstrates an association or connection which is superficial and lacks depth and/or support |
Demonstrates difficulty in making or supporting an association or connection |
Demonstrates no meaningful associations or connections |
| 1.7 |
Evaluates literary quality and/or technique of a text |
Demonstrates perceptive judgments about literary quality that are supported with examples |
Demonstrates thoughtful judgments about literary quality that are generally supported with examples |
Demonstrates judgments about literary quality that tend to lack depth or are not well supported |
Demonstrates judgments about literary quality that tend to be formulaic and/or lack examples |
Demonstrates judgments about literary quality that are superficial, emotional, or unsupported |
Demonstrates no awareness of the literary quality of the story |
| 1.8 |
Follows grammatical and mechanical rules in writing |
Free of most mistakes in grammar, word usage, and mechanics |
Generally free of mistakes in grammar, word usage, and mechanics |
Contains some mistakes in grammar, word usage, and mechanics |
Contains many mistakes in grammar, word usage, and mechanics |
Contains frequent mistakes in grammar, word usage, and mechanics |
Grammar and word usage are so poor, they interfere with meaning; very poor mechanics |
| 1.9 |
Demonstrates organization and fluency in writing |
Well organized and clearly focused; clearly coherent, and ideas flow seamlessly |
Well organized and focused; demonstrates coherence, and ideas flow well |
Generally organized, focused; demonstrates some coherence, attention to the flow of ideas |
Limited in organization and focus; demonstrates lapses in coherence or flow of ideas |
Poorly organized; lacks focus; problems with coherence or flow of ideas |
Disorganized; little or no focus; incoherent |
| 1.10 |
Utilizes accurate and appropriate vocabulary in writing |
Displays skillful use of language; vocabulary is accurate and varied; words are appropriately and skillfully chosen |
Displays competent use of language; uses appropriate vocabulary |
Displays adequate but inconsistent use of language; vocabulary used is generally appropriate |
Displays developing use of language; contains indications of weak vocabulary and poor word selection |
Poor use of language indicates very limited vocabulary and poor word choice |
Contains fundamental vocabulary mistakes |
Speaking |
Score Point 6 |
Score Point 5 |
Score Point 4 |
Score Point 3 |
Score Point 2 |
Score Point 1 |
| 2.1 |
Demonstrates the ability to engage the listener |
Keen ability to engage the listener in what is being said |
Ability to engage the listener in what is being said |
Some ability to engage the listener in what is being said but the listener may become distracted |
Some ability to engage the listener in what is being said |
Little ability to engage the listener in what is being said |
No ability to engage the listener in what is being said |
| 2.2 |
Conveys meaning and purpose in presentation |
Demonstrates exceptional ability to convey meaning and purpose |
Demonstrates acceptable ability to convey meaning and purpose |
Demonstrates moderate ability to convey meaning and purpose |
Demonstrates limited ability to convey meaning and purpose |
Demonstrates little ability to convey meaning and purpose |
Demonstrates no ability to convey meaning and purpose |
| 2.3 |
Projects voice, speaks clearly and enunciates sound units within words |
Demonstrates the ability to perform all skills exceedingly well |
Demonstrates the ability to perform all skills well |
Demonstrates the ability to perform most skills well |
Demonstrates inconsistent ability to perform most skills well |
Demonstrates little ability to perform most skills |
Demonstrates no ability to perform the skills |
| 2.4 |
Varies pitch, uses inflection, appropriate rate of delivery, facial expression and good posture |
Demonstrates the ability to perform all skills exceedingly well |
Demonstrates the ability to perform all skills well |
Demonstrates the ability to perform most skills well |
Demonstrates inconsistent ability to perform most skills well |
Demonstrates little ability to perform most skills |
Demonstrates no ability to perform the skills |
| 2.5 |
*Delivery demonstrates the ability to express original ideas, rich in quality and quantity |
Demonstrates exceptional ability to express original ideas, rich in quality and quantity |
Demonstrates acceptable ability to express original ideas, rich in quality and quantity |
Demonstrates moderate ability to express original ideas, rich in quality and quantity |
Demonstrates limited ability to express original ideas, rich in quality and quantity |
Demonstrates little ability to express original ideas, rich in quality and quantity |
Demonstrates no ability to express original ideas, rich in quality and quantity |
| 2.6 |
Maintains conversation and clarifies purpose by asking and answering questions |
Asks detailed questions in an effort to maintain continued purpose |
Asks questions in an effort to maintain continued purpose |
Asks few questions in an effort to maintain limited purpose |
Asks few questions in an effort to maintain purpose |
Asks too few questions in an effort to maintain purpose |
Asks no questions and maintains no purpose |
| 2.7 |
Delivery is understood by target audience |
Keen understanding by target audience |
Understood by target audience |
Some understanding by target audience |
Some understanding by target audience however questions remain |
Little understanding by target audience |
No understanding by target audience |
| 2.8 |
Demonstrates organization and fluency in speaking |
Well organized and clearly focused; clearly coherent, and ideas flow seamlessly |
Well organized and focused; demonstrates coherence, and ideas flow well |
General organized, focused; demonstrates some coherence, attention to the flow of ideas |
Limited in organization and focus; demonstrates lapses in coherence or flow of ideas |
Poorly organized; lacks focus; problems with coherence or flow of ideas |
Disorganized; little or no focus; incoherent |
| 2.9 |
Follows grammatical and mechanical rules in speaking |
Free of most mistakes in grammar, word usage, and mechanics |
Generally free of mistakes in grammar, word usage, and mechanics |
Contains some mistakes in grammar, word usage, and mechanics |
Contains many mistakes in grammar, word usage, and mechanics |
Contains frequent mistakes in grammar, word usage, and mechanics |
Grammar and word usage are so poor, they interfere with meaning; very poor mechanics |
| 2.10 |
Utilizes accurate and appropriate vocabulary in speaking |
Displays skillful use of language; vocabulary is accurate and varied; words are appropriately and skillfully chosen |
Displays competent use of language; uses appropriate vocabulary |
Displays adequate but inconsistent use of language; vocabulary used is generally appropriate |
Displays developing use of language; contains indications of weak vocabulary and poor word selection |
Poor use of language indicates very limited vocabulary and poor word choice |
Contains fundamental vocabulary mistakes |
Problem Solving |
Score Point 6 |
Score Point 5 |
Score Point 4 |
Score Point 3 |
Score Point 2 |
Score Point 1 |
| 3.1 |
Demonstrates understanding of the problem |
Full and complete understanding of concepts and processes essential to the problem |
Demonstrates acceptable understanding of concepts and processes essential to the problem |
Reasonable understanding of the concepts and processes essential to the problem |
Partial understanding of the concepts and processes essential to the problem |
Demonstrates a literal or superficial understanding of the problem |
Demonstrates serious misunderstanding with the concepts and processes essential to the problem |
| 3.2 |
Utilizes appropriate information to solve the problem |
All necessary information is utilized to solve the problem |
Nearly all necessary information is utilized to solve the problem |
Most necessary information is utilized to solve the problem |
Partial amount of appropriate information utilized to solve the problem |
Little amount of appropriate information utilized to solve the problem |
Poor use of appropriate information to solve the problem |
| 3.3 |
Develops a strategy to solve the problem |
An effective strategy is selected which includes a clear and efficient method's to reach an appropriate conclusion |
An effective strategy is selected but clarity and efficiency are missing |
A reasonable strategy is selected which includes methods necessary to reach an appropriate conclusion |
Demonstrates a strategy that is haphazard and lacks the necessary methods of solution |
Poor use of strategy including incorrect conclusion |
Limited strategy |
| 3.4 |
Applies methods necessary to solve the problem |
Coherently and efficiently executes a method to demonstrate full understanding; contains no errors |
Method of execution may contain minor errors that do not detract from demonstration of full understanding |
Procedure execution contains errors that provide evidence of sufficient understanding |
Contains errors in fundamental procedures that provides evidence that student lacks sufficient understanding |
Contains frequent errors in procedures, leading to incorrect solution |
Unable to solve problem, has misunderstood the problem, or has neglected to solve the problem |
| 3.5 |
Organizes work that leads to an appropriate conclusion |
Effectively organizes work, requiring no reader inference |
Organization of work is evident and minimal reader inference is required |
Organization of work is evident, but reader inference may be necessary |
Some organization of work, but reader inference is necessary |
Little ability to organize work |
Fails to organize work and conclusion unclear or inaccurate |
| 3.6 |
Communicates conclusions from a problem or investigation |
Demonstrates exceptional ability to communicate a correct/appropriate conclusion referencing work/data from the problem/investigation |
Demonstrates acceptable ability to communicate a correct/appropriate conclusion referencing work/data from the problem/investigation |
Demonstrates ability to communicate conclusions from a problem/investigation, but with insufficient evidence |
Demonstrates some ability to communicate conclusions from a problem/investigation, but with minimal evidence |
States a conclusion with no supporting work |
No conclusion is evident |
| 3.7 |
Demonstrates the ability to evaluate the results and processes used to achieve them |
Demonstrates exceptional ability to evaluate the results and processes used to achieve them |
Demonstrates acceptable ability to evaluate the results and processes used to achieve them |
Demonstrates moderate ability to evaluate the results and processes used to achieve them |
Demonstrates limited ability to evaluate the results and processes used to achieve them |
Demonstrates little ability to evaluate the results and processes used to achieve them |
Demonstrates no ability to evaluate the results and processes used to achieve them |
Research Skills |
Score Point 6 |
Score Point 5 |
Score Point 4 |
Score Point 3 |
Score Point 2 |
Score Point 1 |
| 4.1 |
Utilizes a variety of sources |
Evidence of thoughtful searching for traditional and electronic sources |
Successfully searches a wide variety of traditional and electronic data sources |
Adequate evidence of searching for traditional or electronic sources |
Some evidence of searching for traditional or electronic sources |
Little evidence of searching for traditional or electronic sources |
No evidence of searching for traditional or electronic sources |
| 4.2 |
Demonstrates an understanding of research task's) |
Demonstrates a clear and complete comprehension of research tasks |
Demonstrates an effective comprehension of research tasks |
Demonstrates an adequate comprehension of research tasks |
Demonstrates a general comprehension of research tasks |
Demonstrates little comprehension of research tasks |
Demonstrates no comprehension of research tasks |
| 4.3 |
Uses valid resources |
Exceptionally assures use of valid resources |
Completely assures use of valid resources |
Adequately assures use of valid resources |
Generally assures use of valid resources |
Minimally assures use of valid resources |
Frequently uses invalid resources |
| 4.4 |
Uses relevant information |
Exceptionally assures that information is valid and relevant |
Completely assures that information is relevant |
Adequately assures that information is relevant |
Generally assures that information is valid and relevant |
Minimally assures that information is valid and relevant |
Frequently uses invalid and/or irrelevant information or data |
| 4.5 |
Interprets and synthesizes information |
Coherently and insightfully interprets and synthesizes information. |
Effectively interprets and synthesizes information |
Makes an adequate attempt to interpret or synthesize information |
Makes some attempt to interpret or synthesize information |
Makes a minimal attempt to interpret or synthesize information |
Makes no attempt to interpret or synthesize information |
| 4.6 |
Documents sources |
Demonstrates exceptional knowledge of source documentation |
Demonstrates effective knowledge of source documentation |
Demonstrates adequate knowledge of source documentation |
Demonstrates basic knowledge of source documentation |
Demonstrates little knowledge of source documentation |
Does not adhere to specified standards |
Critical Thinking |
Score Point 6 |
Score Point 5 |
Score Point 4 |
Score Point 3 |
Score Point 2 |
Score Point 1 |
| 5.0 |
Acknowledges alternative points of view for the purpose of refutation or modification |
Demonstrates a keen ability to restate, evaluate, synthesize and challenge alternative points of view |
Demonstrates an awareness of points of view and can restate and evaluate but lacks ability to synthesize |
Demonstrates a basic ability to restate and evaluate alternative points of view |
Demonstrates some though insufficient ability to draw conclusions |
Little ability to draw conclusions |
Demonstrates an inability to draw even limited conclusions |